x
6 Nisan 2017- Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu 1. Başkanvekili Servet Yardımcı, 34 oyla UEFA yönetim kurulu üyesi seçildi. UEFA'nın 41. genel kurulunda alınan kararla Şenes Erzik'in UEFA'yı FIFA'da temsil etme görevi de sona erdi. 19 Mart 2017- UEFA Şampiyonlar Ligi çeyrek finaline kalan takımlar belli oldu. Bayern Münih-Real Madrid, Barcelona-Juventus, Atletico Madrid-Leicester City, Borussia Dortmund-Monaco, yarı final için mücadele edecekler. 10 Şubat 2017- Galatasaray Başkanı Özbek, kulübün bankalara olan borcunun, Riva ve Florya projeleri sonrası kulüp kasasına giren son ödemelerle birlikte 750 milyon TL 'den  430 milyon TL civarına gerilediğini ifade etti.  28 Ocak 2017- Deloitte'un 2015-16 sezonuna ilişkin düzenlediği Para Ligi raporunda Manchester United 689 Milyon Euro'luk geliriyle, 11 yıl aradan sonra tekrar lider oldu. 2,ve 3. Sırada 620'şer Milyon Euro ile Barcelona ve R.Madrid yer aldı. 24 Ocak 2017- Türk futbolunun duayenlerinden Gençler Birliği kulüp başkanı İlhan Cavcav 81 yaşında yaşamını yitirdi. 23 Ocak 2017- Para Ligi'nde iki Türk takımı. Deloitte'un 2015-16 Para Ligi'ne FB 25. Galatasaray ise 30.sıradan girdi.   2 Ocak 2017- Türk futbolu 10 yılda 5 kat büyüdü, gelirler 2 milyar TL'yi aştı. 5 Aralık 2016- Football Leaks ile Jose Mourinho ve C.Ronaldo başta olmak üzere, bir çok ünlü oyuncu vergi kaçırmakla itham ediliyor. 21 Kasım 2016- Önümüzdeki 5 sezonun Süper Lig ve TFF 1. Lig müsabakaları yayın haklarının devri için düzenlenen ihaleyi 500 milyon dolarla Digiturk kazandı. 17 Kasım 2016- Barcelona, Japon internet firmalarından Rakuten ile 2017-18 sezonu için 58 milyon Dolarlık forma sponsorluğu için anlaştı. 
Buradasınız >> Ana Sayfa Haberler & Makaleler Mali Diğer Yazarlar Sky and BT retain Premier League TV rights for record £5.1bn

Sky and BT retain Premier League TV rights for record £5.1bn

PL Broadcasting

The Guardian- 11 February 2015 Premier League TV rights grow to £5.1bn but case for redistribution strengthens. The latest rights deal shows yet again the robust financial might of the Premier League, so it must do more for the grassroots.

Sky and BT retain Premier League TV rights for record £5.1bn...The Premier League’s longstanding ringmaster Richard Scudamore is fond of referring to its all pervasive Barnum & Bailey routine as his No1 priority.

 

Perpetually under pressure to redistribute more of the Premier League’s TV billions to what it likes to call “good causes” (and what others might call the rest of football), he makes the not entirely unreasonable point that without investing huge sums in the best players and facilities there would be less of everything to go round.

“We can’t be clearer. Unless the show is a good show, with the best talent and played in decent stadia with full crowds, then it isn’t a show you can sell,” he once told the Guardian. “I see none of those fundamental building blocks being reduced. In fact I see the opposite.”

 

He has been proved right by today’s telephone-number figures. The total figure of £5.136bn represents a 70% increase on the last UK television deal. Between them, Sky, who again won the pick of the seven packages, retaining both the prestigious Sunday and Monday evening slots, and BT, who kept two of the smaller packages, are now paying over £10m per Premier League fixture.

 

In pure revenue raising terms Scudamore and his small cabal of lawyers and rights experts, who are responsible for an auction structure that has become a licence to print money, deserve the backslapping reception they will receive from the 20 clubs for vastly increasing their income once again.

 

Scudamore sat at a press conference three years ago and warned clubs not to squander their 70% increase entirely on agents and wages. They proceeded to largely ignore him and, without intervention, there is nothing to suggest they won’t do the same again. The first £500,000-a-week Premier League footballer cannot be far away.

 

Media analysts and City experts have stopped asking when this particular bubble is going to burst and started speculating on whether it will defy economic wisdom by continuing to inflate. As one source close to the auction said, it is becoming increasingly clear the bubble won’t burst but will simply change shape depending on who is in the market.

 

With the BBC’s Match of the Day offering (now to expand to include a midweek show from 2016-2017) catering for those who can’t or won’t pay for pay TV and digital media, BT’s arrival as a major force in sports broadcasting could not have come at a better time for Scudamore, ensuring the presence of at least two companies with clear strategic reasons to invest way beyond what matches could recoup in standalone terms as they scrapped over TV, broadband and phone customers. Soon, they will add mobile to the mix too.

 

Meanwhile, the Premier League has proved increasingly adept at marketing its product overseas, with the US, India and China still showing plenty of room for growth.

 

That sell is only becoming more sophisticated, with live events and distinct commercial offerings from clubs complementing one another to build audiences further. From Jakarta to New Jersey, it is only possible to see international deals going the same way and the current total of £5.5bn over three seasons being comfortably surpassed.

 

In an age of financial fair play when the books must (just about) balance, clubs increasingly look to media and commercial income to pull away from European competitors.

 

Healthy broadcasting income, driven by fierce competition for customers in the communications market and the popularity of the Premier League overseas, paired with a collective selling model that sees money redistributed more fairly than other leagues has boosted the earning power of English clubs compared to their European rivals.

 

Fourteen of the 30 biggest earning clubs in the world were English, according to the Deloitte Money League published last month. All 20 Premier League clubs appear in the top 40.

 

But as the 20 clubs gorge themselves on another huge hike in cash from 2016-2017 thanks to competition that has driven the overall take from live games alone to £5.136bn,the questions about how that money is spent will return at an ever louder volume.

 

sport TV rights

Every time the Premier League announces a new rights bumper haul, the queue starts to form outside its Gloucester Place HQ of those wanting a slice of a cake that has grown to gargantuan proportions in the 23 years since Sky first paid £191m over five years for 60 matches per season.

 

Some see those within the gilded circle (and those on the periphery in receipt of increasingly generous “parachute payments”) as greedy toddlers at a birthday party unable to stop cramming more cake into their mouths, oblivious to those hovering underneath trying to catch the crumbs.

 

Over recent years, the Premier League has become increasingly aware of the fact it must be seen to be helping those beyond its borders. It points to the huge tax take from players’ wages, to the benefits to UK plc of the Premier League’s popularity abroad. More specifically, it argues that more than a sixth of its overall income is distributed beyond the 20 clubs.

 

Even the invitation to the press conference unveiling the latest deal came with a reminder of the Premier League’s community programme at the bottom as if to ram home the point.

 

But the fact is the majority of that cash goes to Football League clubs in the form of parachute payments to relegated clubs and so-called “solidarity payments”. Only around 4% of the Premier League’s income filters down to the grassroots.

 

This time around, there is a feeling abroad that the sums are so huge that the elephant in the room can no longer be ignored.

 

Fans’ groups protesting about the cost of attending football and raising long standing concerns about ageing crowds and a generation being lost are hopeful that the Premier League will respond with a definitive gesture such as an across the board price cut for away fans.

 

As matchday income becomes comparatively less important – a club such as Chelsea now only make just over a fifth of their overall revenue from ticket sales – there is a creeping realisation that action is required to maintain the vibrant atmosphere that helps power TV income at home and abroad.

 

Growing commercial revenues abroad is all very well but strengthening bonds at home is important too, especially as the latest deal chips away even further at the sacred 3pm Saturday window with the introduction of up to 10 Friday night games that will be great for TV viewers but not so special for travelling fans.

 

For the comparative peanuts it would cost them, such a gesture would be worth it in PR terms alone. Likewise stumping up the £50m the Football Association needs to deliver on its long overdue £150m plan to start overhauling the shockingly dilapidated stock of pitches in this country.

 

When the league is awash with billions, English football’s petty turf wars that habitually derail discussions over who should pay for what start to look even sillier than usual.

 

It is one of the enduring shames of the Premier League age that the same endless debate about facilities and coaching is still taking place 23 years after the top clubs broke away to create what has become an incredibly popular consumer entertainment product.

 

The concept of pooling money centrally is now well established – see the £340m plunged into the elite players performance plan to overhaul the academy system and the existing Away Fans’ Fund – and the Premier League ought to be bolder in putting more aside for the wider good.

 

Scudamore would argue that it cannot be held responsible for selling off the playing fields, squandering the Olympic legacy or the obesity crisis and that his job is to get on with the show.

 

But with the sort of cash now swilling through its coffers, it can start to do something about them and in the process make it much harder for politicians such as the shadow sports minister Clive Efford to accuse it of fostering a “culture of greed”.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/feb/10/premier-league-tv-rights-grow-sky-sports?CMP=share_btn_tw

Bu İçerik  1590  Defa Okunmuştur
 

Degerli yazarimiz Futbol Ekonomi Site Yetkilisi Perşembe, 22 Eylül 2011.

YAZARIN DIGER YAZILARINI GORMEK ICIN TIKLAYIN

Neden Futbol Ekonomisi?

 

www. Futbolekonomi.com’un  vizyon ve misyonu temel olarak  Futbol Ekonomisi Stratejik Araştırma Merkezi’nin (FESAM) vizyon ve misyonuna paralel ve aynı düzlemdedir.

 

Bu bağlamda temel misyonumuz: Futbolun yerel ve küresel makro özelliklerini incelemek ve yeni yapısal modeller önermek; bu kapsamda entelektüel gelişimi hızlandırmak ve buna ilişkin referans olabilecek bir database oluşturmak ve bunu tüm futbol araştırmacılarının emrine sunmak... Bu amaçla yapılan çalışmaları yayımlamak; gerekli her türlü bilimsel futbol araştırma ve geliştirme projelerine entelektüel anlamda destek vermek.

 

Temel Vizyonumuz: Önerilen yeni modellerin gerçekleştiğini görmektir.

 devamı >>>

tbmm-logo

 

TÜRKİYE BÜYÜK MİLLET MECLİSİ

Spor Kulüplerinin Sorunları ile

Sporda Şiddet Sorununun Araştırılarak

Alınması Gereken Önlemlerin

Belirlenmesi Amacıyla Kurulan

 

MECLİS ARAŞTIRMASI

KOMİSYONU

RAPORU

tugrulaksar_ge_roportaj

Tuğrul Akşar Güngör Urasın sorularını yanıtlıyor

  Yazar Tuğrul Akşar,
Milliyet Gazetesi Yazarı Güngör Uras'ın
sorularını yanıtlıyor.
detay için tıklayınız..

 

e- Bülten Üyeliği

E-Bülten listemize üye olmak için lütfen aşağıdaki alanları doldurunuz.

Spor Endexi

24.04.2017 Kapanış Günlük
Değişim %
  IMKB 100

93.208

0,85

 bjk BJKAS

5,17

1,97

 fb FENER

34,56

0,76

 gs GSRAY

24,20

0,00

 trabzon TSPOR

2,66

0,76

 

       

Videolar

Tuğrul, Tuğrul Akşar, Pusula, Ekonomi, Futbol, Futbol Ekonomi, Mali,VİDEONUN DEVAMI VE DİĞER VİDEOLAR İÇİN TIKLAYIN.

İstatistikler

İçerik Tıklama Görünümü : 13530356

Spor Toto Süper Lig 2016-17 Puan Durumu

Sıra TAKIMLAR O G B M A Y AV P
1

BEŞİKTAŞ

28 19 7 2 57 25 32 64
2 BAŞAKŞEHİR 28 16 9 3 54 25 29 57
3 FENERBAHÇE

28

15 8 5 51 26 25 53
4

GALATASARAY

28
15
4
9
50

33

17
49
5 TRABZONSPOR
28
14
5
9
34
27
7

47 

6

ANTALYASPOR

28
12
7
9
32
35
-3
43
7

GENÇLERBİRLİĞİ

28
10
9
9
28
28
0
39
8

KONYASPOR

28
10
9
9
33
35
-2
39
9

OSMANLISPOR

28
9

10 

9
36
32
4
37
10

KASIMPAŞA

28
10
7
11
38
37
1
37
11

KARABÜKSPOR

28

10
5
13
30
37
-7
35
12

BURSASPOR

28
10
5

13

30
40
-10
35
13

ALANYASPOR

28
10
4
14
45
51
-6
34
14

AKHİSAR BLD.

28
9
6

13 

26
39
-13
33
15

KAYSERİSPOR

28
7
6
15
36
51
-15
27
16

GAZİANTEPSPOR

28
7
4
17
28
47

-19

25
17

Ç.RİZESPOR

28
6
6
16
30
46
-16
24
18

ADANASPOR

28
5
5
18
26
50
-24
20

Okur Yazar


Futbolun ekonomisi, mali, hukuksal ve yönetsel kısmına ilişkin varsa makalelerinizi bize gönderin, sizin imzanızla yayınlayalım.

Yazılarınızı  info@futbolekonomi.com adresine gönderebilirsiniz. 

 

 

2018 Dünya Kupası 1.Tur 1.Grup Puan D.

Avrupa Elemeleri 1.Tur Grup I
Sıra TAKIM O G B M A Y PUAN AV
1

hirvatistan-bayrak Hırvatistan

5 4 1 0 11 1 13 10
2 izlanda-bayrak İzlanda 5 3 1 1 8 6 10 2
3 ukrayna-bayrak Ukranya

5

2 2 1 7 4 8 3
4

turk-bayrak Türkiye

5 2 2 1
7

5

8 2
5 kosova-bayrak Kosova
5 0 1
4 2 14 1

1

6

finlandiya-bayrak Finlandiya

5 0 1 4
3

8

1 -5

Money Football League

    

Deloitte-Money-League-17

   

“Yirmincisi yayınlanan 2017 Deloitte Para Ligi Raporu’na göre Manchester United 689 Milyon Euro’luk geliriyle tekrar zirvenin sahibi oldu. Fenerbahçe ve Galatasaray da, 25. ve 26.sıradan tekrar Para Ligi’ne girdiler.”
Raporu okumak için Tıklayınız

 


    

EkoLig-Foto

 

EkoLig - Futbol Ekonomisi Raporu, Türk Futbolunun gelirlerini ve ekonomik görünümünü mercek altına alan ve futbolun finansal verilerini Avrupa'nın önde gelen ligleri ile karşılaştırmalı olarak sunan rapor 
için tıklayınız 

 

 

Endustriyel_futbol

 

Futbolda Endüstriyel Denge ve Başarı Üzerine

Futbolun Endüstriyel gelişimi, kulüplerin sportif ve iktisadi/mali yapılanışını derinden etkiliyor. Dorukhan Acar’ın Kurumsal Yönetim temelli yaklaşımı ile "Futbolda Endüstriyel Denge ve Başarı"yı okumak için klikleyiniz

 

 

Türkiye'de Kadın Futbolunun Gelişimi ve Günümüzdeki Durumu

 

imagesCAVM4O4L

 

Dr. Lale ORTA’nın Kadın Futboluna Entelektüel Bir Yaklaşım Sergilediği makalesi için tıklayınız.” 

 

 

İngiliz Futbolunda Kurumsal Yönetişim Üzerine

 

governance_in_football

 

Tüm kulüplerimize ve Türk Futbol yapılanmasına farklı bir bakış açısı kazandırabileceğini düşündüğümüz, İngiliz Parlementosu’nun Kültür, medya ve spor Komitesi’nin hazırladığı raporu okumak için tıklayınız. 

 

money-and-soccer

“Money scorring goals”, Gerçekten de “Para Gol Kaydedebiliyor mu? “

Euro 2012’nin olası ekonomik etkilerini
okumak için tıklayınız. 



FFP

Futbolda Finansal Sürdürülebilirlik Kapsamında ''Finansal Fair Play Başa Baş Kuralı ve Beşiktaş Futbol Kulübü Üzerinde Bir Uygulama 
Hüseyin AKTAŞ/Salih MUTLU,

okumak için tıklayınız.